toto togel toto togel toto togel toto slot toto slot toto slot toto slot toto slot toto slot toto slot toto slot toto slot toto slot situs toto toto slot slot 4d slot 4d slot 4d slot 4d slot 4d slot 4d slot 4d slot 4d slot 4d slot 4d slot 4d slot 4d slot 4d slot 4d slot 4d slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot 4d slot777 situs toto situs toto situs toto situs toto slot777 slot777 slot777 slot777 slot777 slot777 slot777 kaskus288 kaskus288 kaskus288 situs toto situs toto situs toto situs toto kaskus288 kaskus288 toto togel toto togel toto togel toto togel toto slot toto slot toto slot toto 4d gogon4d gogon4d vertu789 tombak118 tombak118 tombak118 tombak118 tombak118 tombak118 tombak118 karatetoto karatetoto situs toto

Review Process

All manuscripts submitted to the Jurnal Kebidanan Malakbi must follow the focus & scope and journal writing guidelines. Manuscripts submitted must have scientific benefits or novelty. All manuscripts sent to this journal are written in Indonesian. Articles that have been submitted must not be published or submitted for publication elsewhere during the peer review process.

All manuscripts submitted must be free from plagiarism content as stated by the results of a similarity check using plagiarism detection software (Turnitin or iThenticate). The editor will also check the similarity of the manuscript in this journal using Turnitin software.

Manuscripts submitted to this journal will be reviewed by at least 2 (two) or more expert reviewers according to the focus & scope of the manuscript. The reviewers provide scientific corrections that are important to improve the substance of the manuscript. If the review results between 2 reviewers are contradictory, a third reviewer will be added to provide critical comments on the submitted manuscript. The review process used in this journal is a double blind peer review system.

The final decision on manuscript acceptance is made entirely by the Editor in Chief based on the review results. The final decision on a manuscript is based entirely on the Editor's final review which considers the reviewer's comments (but not solely by the reviewer).